NFL Philosophies
The NFL is the most popular sports league in the United States.
One of the reasons why, is the parity and hope of renewal each new
season brings it’s fan base. The overall talent from the worst team
to the best team is much closer than most fans realize. It is fan’s
opinion that determines the line and totals to odds makers. Odds
makers make money by getting as close to equal wagering on either
side of the spread or total. Trying to find where the wagering
majority (the public) is wrong creates wins. This is not a new
concept, every successful handicapper does this, and it is mismatch
analysis that separates who wins and who loses. Discipline is a
heavy part of Trevor’s picks. Some weeks there may be only one or
two wagers he likes. Hopefully wherever you wager has team and
player props, as Trevor often makes these types of wagers for the
NFL. An appropriate example of this is last year’s NFC Championship
Game. After researching the spread, the totals and the money line,
he felt the safest bet was Arizona over 21.5 points on their own.
Even during their Thanksgiving Day slaughter at the hands of the
Eagles, they scored 20. Needless to say, he was able to watch the
second half with little trepidation.
College FBS
Philosophies
The FBS (football
bowl subdivision) is much different than NFL wagering. One, the
players are kids. Two, the talent discrepancies between teams can be
very high. Three, coaching compensations and systems vary greatly.
Four, the schedules are unbalanced. Five, 120 different teams
versus 32. As a result, sometimes the spreads and totals are much
higher, and props and money lines may be non-existent. One trend
often seen in Trevor’s FBS wagering is repeating on certain teams
week after week. Each year, after a few weeks, he will settle on
one or two teams to ride heavily. Trevor’s “horses” were Oregon in
2007 (until Dixon’s injury) and Oklahoma State in 2008. Both
covered or went over their totals at an excellent rate. With many
more teams to keep track of, and more geographically regionalized
fan bases, wagering majorities are more inaccurate than in the NFL.
|